Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
I notice the only thing Eomer's put forth today is that he agrees with Nerwen about the possibility of wolves holding their votes until late, and doesn't see anything Seerish about Nog. It's been a while since I played with Eomer, but I seem to remember him being more... involved, as a wolf. He's striking me as 'bored ordo' right now, but I could still vote him on principle! *mean look*
|
Remember the game when
Eowolf and I made you our first Night-kill? (Rhetoric question, I don't think you've forgotten it so soon...
) He was almost as lazy then as he is now, mostly going after
Greenie in an apodictic way with no clearly explained reasons, exactly like he voted
Agan on Day1. I certainly wouldn't rule him out as a wolf... or maybe a Wight.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zil
Perhaps we can technically "afford to lynch another quiet player", but that doesn't mean we should.
|
Why shouldn't we, Inzil? It's a given fact that quiet players are harder to catch at anything than loud players simply because of the amount of talking they do. Plus I'm for lynching lurkers on principle and always have been. |
Agreed. And it's interesting
Zil said this, given his vote for
Kath. Another brick in the wall.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
Inzil is currently topping my "will vote for" list, followed by Eomer.
|
You know what, I could actually get behind this.
