Here's the voting from yesterDay. I have added a few comments there but my main comments will come in a separate post.
about 12 hours before DL
Lottie -> Skip
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottie
Because his tone feels off, his votes thus far have been rather poor (basically cementing Shasta at four votes and introducing Legate when there hadn't been much suspicion of him and there really was no chance of lynching him at all) and because I don't have any stronger suspicions.
|
about 3 hours before DL
Boro -> Eönwë
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boro
I know it's kind of crappy to do this, but I'm going to gone for the rest of the day. Those last minute, right before the DL posts are just confusing me and impossible to read before the DL is up. Also, his voting has been suspect with abstaining from voting on Day 1. Although, understandable because at that point no vote would have mattered. But then then Day 2's vote for Lottie which he cryptically said he'd explain today. I was hoping he'd be on sooner to explain it this time, but appears not.
|
from this on only the minutes before DL in front of the votes
0:30
Nerwen -> Skip 2
Dead innocent…
The last minute's frenzy begins...
0:06
Green -> Skip 3
A case built up in post #255 (page 7)
*someone please remind me how to make links to individual posts!*
0:06
Ozban -> Legate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozban
I really like Skip's posts analyzing Legate. And I tend to vote for him today. First he openly doubts Pitch's furryness. And than he washes his hands, by voting Lottie.
Same he did the day before. He made his case against her, never wavered (that itself looks weird, considering lack of any evidence). Truth is, that his second Lottie-vote might have been just a rushed, it was first vote on second lynch, and Leg was going off, but it more likely was calculated move, because Pitch's lynching was unavoidable, and it's much better-looking this way than, propeling secong wagon in a row.
|
0:03
Skip -> Legate 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
I guess I'd have to go with Legate
|
(survival reasons?)
There is the huge Legalysis on posts #229 & #230 (page 6). The outcome of it seemed to boil down on this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
Here we go, it's the Shasta-Lottie-Pitch thing once again. So far everything coming out of that triad has been very unfortunate for us Elves, the first two turning out to be a Seer and an ordo. Wouldn't it be horrible if we went on to lynch Lottie and she too turned out innocent!?
Hm. If we lynch Legate and he is a wolf, chances are Lottie is innocent... Lynching Lottie would say little about Legate's role if she's innocent but if she's a wolf that would speak in favour of Legate. Actually I feel a little bit better about Legate after reviewing Day 2, although I'm still worried about him... Oh man this is tough!
|
0:01
wilwa -> Legate 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilwa
I don't like. He's very wishy-washy, seems to go back in forth with his opinions, and just maybe wants to seem more useful then he is and wants to keep everyone happy. I'm leaning that he could be the Cobbler, but I'm suspicious enough of him to vote him.
|
0:01
Nog -> Lottie
Quote:
Originally Posted by me
her explanation that she tried to pull out a seer-impression on D1 looks pretty dubious. Also her vote yesterDay for Pitchie while first driving for other solutions - and in the votepost suspecting Skip the most...
|
But also the fact that
Legate suggested voting
Lottie and I wanted to see competition with the voting - not knowing
wilwa had voted for
Leg...
0:01
Legate -> Skip 4
Dead innocent’s self-preservation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leg
Just in case somebody wanted to vote ME still. I guess the lottie-plan should've started a bit earlier... again we are at bandwagon...
|
0:00
Eönwë -> Lottie 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve
Definitely not liking Lottie. Just reread Day 1.On her second post she suddenly (jokingly?) suspects Shasta, and then suddenly gets more serious about it in her next post, with the very wolvish "here is some evidence for why he could be evil, but I'm probably wrong, but still, look at this evidence" sort of approach. The classic trying-to-start-other-people-suspecting-someone tactic. And then votes him after a few posts, with not much more reasoning.
|
0:00
Inzil -> Legate 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zil
A lot to digest in a short period of time. My apologies.
|
A self-preservation vote?