I don't have so much time now, replying to some posts, but not to all... will look at the rest when I come back...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glirdan
I hate to be the one to blatantly point out the obvious, but all Day 1 lynches are completely random unless a Seer were to stupidly reveal themselves on Day 1 for one Wolf. And what do you mean, "the worst thing about the Seer-lynch"? You mean there WAS something good in lynching our Seer on Day 1? Because if there is I would very much like to hear what. I see no upside to having lynched our Seer yesterDay. Yes I know I was one of those advocating for it, but that is because I actually had suspicions of him on Day 1.
|
There is of course nothing good at lynching the Seer, but the
worst (which is worse than "bad", in case you were wondering) is that it cannot even give us much material to analyse. There would have been something sort-of positive if we could at least get clues from it. But this is pointless, as I have already concluded that there already is something to find there. See above...
Quote:
I see you're point at the end. Yet he could simply be a mere innocent who did not want to join the mob. May I ask why you are more suspicious of him then say, Wilwa, who not only did the exact same thing as he, but even more so as she was the last to vote?
|
It is the way it is phrased and the way they use it. The main point is not just the vote itself, but also how the people explain it.
Wilwa's explanation seemed innocent, whereas
Ozzy seemed more likely fake to me, see above the posts toDay where I am discussing with him.
Quote:
Well that's funny because I just went back through your posts and nowhere do you mention having any form of opinion on myself and I think you only mentioned Skip once and that was asking to hear more of him in post #45
|
It is possible I didn't mention you, but I was curious about you. Late in the Day, as you know, I didn't have time and so didn't post anything long where I could list my opinions on everybody.
Quote:
Here's a thought. Maybe it was Nerwen who the Ranger protected? The Wolves would be smart and go through the game thread and examine every last post and think of the possible meanings, especially after having Shasta revealed as the Seer. They already know that Nerwen is innocent, so why not tie up any loose threads and be done with her so that we couldn't have a known innocent? Maybe the Ranger also picked up on it and that's who he/she chose to protect?
|
That's not a bad idea, of course given if
Nerwen is innocent. I am not 100% sure neither of
Boro's strong suggestion that it is evil
Pitch who was the dream (okay, but now I see he clarified it and said it was meant differently), nor
Glirdy's who seems to suggest rather strongly that it was innocent Nerwen... but we'll see. I'll think of it when I come back.
There is something unnerving me about Lottie's recent post, if I say it shortly, sort of hypocrisy or what... it looks like that... ("oh you lynched
shasta"). I know an innocent can start a bandwaggon unwillingly, but still this looks fake.
Whatever... gotta really run now! Will be back in several hours.