Ok, well I've kind of caught up, but I had to skim read most of the second page.
There's a few comments I'd like to make before anything else.
1. Why
Shasta? I really don't find him suspicious at all. I mean, yes, he's defensive, but he just seems like normal innocent
Shasta. In fact, he just seems like an easy Day 1 lynch, and I think it's quite likely that one of the
Shasta-voters is a wolf who had to vote early.
But then again, this is worse:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
I think I'm going go random with this vote
|
Saying your about to make a random vote is never good, because it seems like your covering yourself against any future effects that might have. So even a little suspicion right now is better than voting randomly.
2. Secondly, all this Cobbler-talk is quite interesting- especially seeing as some people seem like they're changing what their saying to seem more innocent and in line with the crowd.
As for my opinion, I think we should just vote for who seems suspicious, because generally the cobblers seem even more suspicious than wolves, so we'll probably lynch them before the wolves- though obviously it would be much better for us if the wolves kill the cobbler first.
edit: x-ed since Nog's #92