Lottie
So she's abandoned the cautious disclaimers and is going after
Shasta in earnest - but since she said he was her only suspect, she could hardly do anything else. Her reasons are still not the best - I mean,
Shasta had what, two or three very short posts when she began to suspect him; to spot a wolf on such a small basis would be a psychic masterpiece. Which actually makes me wonder whether
Shasta was such an easy suspect at all - wouldn't a
Lottiewolf have found more and better suspicion-fodder in the whole cobbler-discussion? Or was she just being lazy and picking an (at the time) almost-submarine?
Problem is, she does have that genuine-sounding tone, and I'd be loth to see her lynched if she's really an innocent going on gut-feeling... Argh.
Shasta
OK, I'll try not to be biased here. Standing by his suspicion of me is OK, I'll give him that (especially as he could have voted for
Lottie instead). His reasons - well... to
me it looks like he singled me out in the morning as an easy suspect and pretty much ignored everybody else, except when defending himself against
Lottie (which includes his passing suspicion of
Greenie for supporting
Lottie). As for his collection of evidence, I'll leave the evaluation to you.
I don't think his defense against
Lottie was overly aggressive, as she claimed. But there's this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
Fair enough, but you don't get to call me 'nonconfrontational' in one breath and then 'aggressive' in the next.
|
I think it should have been clear that
Lottie was referring to his behaviour
before and
after she suspected him, and muddling that difference to make it look like the person suspecting you is contradicting herself is exactly the kind of defense I would use myself as a wolf (and have).
I'll have to think this over once more, and then vote soonish.
EDIT: x-ed from #71 onwards.