Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
However, it's not easy for the wolves to be so objective– I'd think the voters behind an apparently random Fenrissing would be more likely to get their attention.
|
Yes I understand what you mean and am equally surprised none of the
EW voters died. I still think the wolves don't get paranoid & think
EW was dreamed of so easily, though... But even so, why didn't someone who voted for him die? After all, being part of a random bandwagon against a wolf on day 1 should make them look much more innocent. Even if there was a wolf on the bandwagon, there are three innocents (or two, if the wolves decided to be really mean), and they could easily have gone after one of them. Or were they so afraid of the ranger? Or did they just want to confuse us? Or whatever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Well, you may not think so, but wolves have voted their fellows often enough in the past, and in fact the first vote is arguably the "safest".
|
That's true, but everybody knows quiet players stand a higher risk of getting lynched on day 1, so why make it worse by voting your fellow? In this small a game, even one vote can make a difference.
I'm not saying
skip is innocent, I just think that voting for
EW makes him look more so - as well as everybody else who did that.
I have to leave now, will be back in a few hours.