Okay, my notes turned into a hopefully readable post:
Nogrod’s reasoning seems really screwy. Nerwen hits the nail on the head when she evaluates what she dubs his ‘fork reasoning’. However, it is hard for me to take everything Nerwen says completely seriously. The first day or two, I felt some suspicion towards her, though I could not and still cannot say exactly why. (It does not help that I did not read all of Day 2 very thoroughly.)
But then I read Nogrod’s first post after returning, post number 666 (good blazes, what a number!). He seemed genuinely angry. Wow, it’d be nice if he could put that much feeling into his RPG posts.
(I love you Nogrod, really do.) I have nothing definite to say concerning this, but in my mind, he seemed to refute Nerwen’s post against him pretty darn well. He also seemed to have feeling that a true guilty wouldn’t have.
Although it is true that his posts do not necessarily hold a great deal of meat in them, they seem un-wolfish to me. So, now I’m suspecting both Nogrod and Nerwen, but am leaning more towards Nerwen being guilty. NOT because of what Nogrod said, but because of my previous gut feeling about Nerwen.
--
At first, Lottie’s post about Tum made little sense to me (as has been noted by others) and my impression of Tum after reading half of it (I confess, I didn’t read it all) was that, “She’s a newbie and likely is innocent. If she’s new, it’s not really surprising she agrees with everyone.”
But then I started to see different quotes from her (mostly, her talk about Eonwe being innocent, her comment about Rikae and then in post 600 she takes it back) and saw how absolutely non-uniform they all were and my alarm bells started going off in my head.
Concerning Tum’s post 670 – Sadly shallow. I don’t like saying mean things about people, but that was my impression. Why’d she probably vote for Sally or Rikae when she thought Nogrod was looking more and more suspicious?
--
I noted the few accusations about Phantom, and I still hold to my opinion that I briefly stated yesterday and say that I am getting a feeling that he is innocent.
I know this is a bone of contention for Sally. Why did I defend him when there had been few votes against him? Answer: I had absolutely NO time on my hands to read the thread, I saw he was being voted for, voting time had barely started, and I just wanted to say I thought he wasn’t a wolf. I feared that many people might suspect him and vote for him, that is all.
--
I do not understand why everyone is saying we have two seers. I seriously need to go back and check the admin thread, but I don’t have time tonight and won’t have time tomorrow, neither. Blah.
Sally’s plan of possibly sacrificing Hestia seemed dangerous. Now, understand that as I write this, I don’t quite understand what part exactly Hestia plays and all, or how we even know who Hestia is. Whatever. It seemed odd to be willing to sacrifice her. BUT, as Mac said in post 620, it didn’t seem like a plan a wolf would put forth. My opinion of her is uncertain.
--
Something that has stood out to me twice by the time I get to post 632 is that Mac says that he distrusts Inzil and Wilwa, but he cannot say why. Odd that he should even mention that he has a gut feeling….I don’t think a wolf would do that. I think that a wolf would find something to peg on someone, instead of just saying, “I have a feeling, but I don’t know why….”
--
Okay......I'm posting this without knowing if it's any good at all, but I need to get it out, because I think I'm almost out of time.