Quote:
Originally Posted by Kath
Having literally just read Greenie's post I don't agree with her view on Mac. I thought he was making the point that if one saw hints in Boro's mentioning of Zeus then one had to see the same in Nerwen's mentioning of Hades, not that he actually thought that Nerwen's mention was suspicious. Because he said (about the Boro one):
"It doesn't make sense, but it's definitely deliberate and not a slip. My bet would be a lover leaving a hint for their mate, except that that doesn't really make sense either."
Which I thought meant he didn't really think it was a hint. Maybe Mac will clear that up at some point.
|
Now there is actually a huge difference in suspecting Zeus and Hera calling each other on the thread (which is not a thing they would need to do as they already know each other) than suspecting that Hades is trying to send a message to Persephone (which would make a lot of sense as the latter really needs to find the former for their love to become true).
Now as suspicions go on Day1 I find it perfectly justified to suspect
Nerwen for being Hades and searching for Persephone, but the way
Mac states it in a most vague way - praising
Wilwa's notice of it, saying it's "definitively deliberate" and not a slip - but that it doesn't make sense raises my eyebrows considerably. What were you trying to say? Downplay
Nerwen's possible guilt by bringing the idea to the fore? That would be bold and not smart. But
Kath's defence of
Mac looks odd as well. Just as
Mac manages to say
Boro's remarks were deliberate and not slips but hints, she says
Mac meant they were not hints... Oh my. There's something fishy in here but it's hard to say what. Too many possibilities of which most don't make sense (I see I'm following
Mac's and
Greenie's reasoning here
)