Quote:
Originally Posted by autume98
Thanks for pointing that out. Like I said I would have to go back, and I still hadn't the chance to do that. I had forgotten about the part where people were finding Boro suspicious due to his vote.
|
How did you manage to forget that,
tum? You posted on exactly two topics yesterDay, and that was one of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by autume98
(I probably shouldn't look at WW while I'm at work, and I end up playing with one eye over my shoulder  ) And I kinda was on for over an hour according to the time stamps. However I'm still getting the hang of everything, and it didn't help that I kept losing my concentration due to the internet cutting in and out. I'm sure as I play more games I'll get better at all of this.
As for defending Boro, it looks like I did defend him in post #254. The other posts I was either agreeing with him or talking about vote-plan. It was a bad call on my part to think that he might be innocent. I'm just glad that he's gone, and that another wolf is going down.  |
At #249 you said,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tum
I noticed Boro is under suspicion for bandwagoning Lottie yesterday. Is this the only evidence we have on Boro is there something else?
|
I should call the use of "only" there a subtle defence, implying as it does that his clearly opportunistic vote wasn't really suspicious. And at #257 you said
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tum
I'm not convinced Boro's vote is enough to vote for him.
|
Brief defences, true– but considering the
only topics you discussed yesterDay were a.)
Boro and b.)
Boro's plan, I find it significant. Oh, and the bolding is mine. #249 was your very first post of the Day, and you were clearly well aware of the situation then.
EDIT: clarity; X'd with
Zil.
EDIT2: formatting.