Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aganzir
And really I'm getting slightly bothered about the fact that you keep saying Nog was my & Shasta's first wolf-vote. Or do you know for sure that Mira and Morsul are innocent?
|
But if one of them is a wolf, you or
Shasta can't be, so it doesn't matter. I don't quite get what's the problem here. Obviously we can only analyse possible wolf-on-wolf votes on known wolves, and given that there's only one wolf remaining, there can't be an unknown wolf on unknown wolf vote. So what's the fuss?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
And what do you mean by unsure? I read her posts and wrote what impressions I got. Then I made my conclusion about her based on the said impressions. I'm not sure she's guilty, but I just fail to see why appearing unsure when making an analysis is a sign of innocence.
|
People tend to flip-flop in their analyses even if they are more inclined to see somebody as either guilty or innocent. Your analysis was pretty condemning all along.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
What points are you talking about? When I said it's more likely Nog's fellow didn't try to save him, I didn't consider it something that would somehow incriminate me. You mean I shouldn't say anything that doesn't look entirely good on me because if I do it means I'm a wolf, even if it was helpful to us?
|
No! I didn't say that you presenting a point that puts you in bad light makes you evil, only that it doesn't speak for your innocence either. You would do that as an innocent as well as a wolf. If I ended up sounding it means you're evil it's simply because I remember wolf-
Agans bringing up points harmful to the wolves in previous games. But if I use sense, you would of course come up with points like that as an innocent too. So I guess what I mean is that as the instances when you've brought up such points that I remember are from when you're a wolf the fact that you're doing it now reminds me of Wolf-
Agan but if I think with
reason it doesn't incriminate you (although it doesn't exonerate you either). Was that long enough explanation?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
Glirdy and sally pretty much slipped under my radar all the time - which you should know they wouldn't have done if I had been their fellow.
|
Which is not a good defense because as a wolf you could've pretended they did.
And no need to get so jumpy. *raises eyebrows*
PS. And I don't want to start an innocent-
Agan vs innocent-
Lommy argument (since we have avoided it this far, I'm actually surprised
) nor a wolf-
Agan vs innocent-
Lommy argument started by the person first mentioned to get people think it's another innocent-on-innocent row and thus makes them both look innocent.
edit: xed with everything since Brinn's first
edit2: marked a quote