Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinlómien
Skip is starting to worry me. First he insisted Glirdan was an active part of lynching Sally (which he wasn't), now he's questioning people's motives to vote him and considering the suspicions against him weak. I think I at least have pretty much evidence already, all his interactions with Sally yesterDay plus the things I mentioned in my vote post yesterDay. (I don't get it why it was bad reasoning for a vote. I thought it made a lot of sense, and I had elaborated on most of the points earlier in my long analysis post.) And then on top of that Skip concludes he is not sure about Glirdan, but he's not his top suspect. Fishy. .
|
It may simply be that
Skip, as a newbie, just sees things differently... maybe doesn't really understand what we're talking about when we say someone's "acting wolfish", e.t.c.
That said, it's indeed interesting how persistent
Skip has been toDay– trying one approach after another to defend
Glirdy– first he was "proactively participating in lynching
Sally" (#438), then the suspicion against him comes out of nowhere and "there isn't much weight behind the Glirdan accusers" (#498), then it's
statistically more likely he's innocent(?!) (#504), then
Sally would have only listed one wolf in her"suspect" list, so it's "
Shasta, possibly" (#509). (And then he votes
Shasta on very weak grounds.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinlómien
Nerwen is also starting to worry me. The current situation looks awfully much to me like Sally and Glirdy are two of her fellows and she's doing some pretty drastic moves to make herself look good. I don't have any factual arguments, but somehow the calm rationality in which she presented/presents points against them makes me feel that she knows more than us others, and it's quite disturbing...
|
I don't, though.
EDIT:X'd with
Loslote and
Nienna.
EDIT2:added comment.