Quote:
Originally Posted by A Little Green
That, I think, is a very dangerous path to take (wow, doesn't that sound epic!) because knowing that Lottie has our best interests at heart isn't saying anything about how accurate her suspicions are. Throughout WW history there have been innocents who bark at the wrong tree for an entire game though they have the village's best interests at heart.
|
The advantage of listening to
Lottie is that at least I can be relatively certain she's not trying to mislead me. I already took issue with the fact that she apparently trusts
Mira, who I think looks fairly evil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Little Green
I don't like this one, either. A wolf can very well make great contributions - a Nerwolf certainly can - and off-handedly dismissing the possibility makes it seem like you are grasping at straws to suspect whoever it was who talked about the great contributions. (I've lost the spot where I found this quote, should check that, probably...)
|
Speaking of grasping at straws....
When you say one makes 'great contributions', I take that to mean you
approve of the things they've said. That's why I thought
Glirdan was being contradictory there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legate of Amon Lanc
But even an innocent Zil, in my opinion, would have at least more reservations about thinking Glirdy innocent on sally's comment - I mean, Zil has played dozens of games already, and he obviously should know that such random comments thrown by Wolves especially in such a situation can mean anything, or nothing, and they can be bluffs, double-bluffs, triple-bluffs or who knows what. So this very simple reasoning... there is just something wrong with it. But the problem is that it's just clumsy, which does not speak as itself for his guilt or innocence - the possibility of him being a Wolf and "misexpecting" the village's reaction, however, sounds at least a bit more probable and makes a bit more sense (but still it's just weird).
|
Incredible as it may seem, no: wolf-on-wolf was not my first thought there. Why not? Probably because what
Sally did would not have occurred to me, had I been in her position.
And for the record, this is game # 13 for me.