Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilwa
So hypothetically if we never lynch a wolf then it would take them until about Day 4 to win.
|
Yay! Go wolves!
(Hey, I AM insane, you know...)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottie
Actually, if there is any merit to that, he could be Two-Face trying to hint. That should definitely be taken with a hint of salt, though, and hinting is always doubtful.
|
Or he could be a wolf hinting to Two-Face.
|
Or this post (well, the last line anyway) could be a wolf hinting to what she hopes is a two-face hint. Never noticed that before, but as soon as I was looking back at posts I noticed it and went “Whoa....”. And we know Nerwen’s crafty so I’d not put such games past her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottie
But I actually did have a point with all this: cobbler hinting is not neccessarily straight forward, and I don't think we should automatically assume Boro's evil.
|
*shrugs* Oh you want a serious answer? Well, then: wolves and cobblers don't often jump straight in and start hinting away in the very first post of the game. So it probably wasn't a hint. But then again it might be. Or maybe not. Who knows?
|
Add this to my previous thoughts. As we all know, joking and facetiousness are good masks for actual hinting.
Also, for some reason the fact that she said ‘wolves and cobblers’ rather than ‘wolves’ strikes me; it’s as if she knows Boro isn’t a wolf, so she needs to put up both possibilities. Of course to be fair she could have just been being thorough, but still, my earlier observations stand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Now I am eating a dear little apple named Jonathan.
"Please! Please don't eat me!" Jonathan begged. Alas! He was so crisp and tasty, I swallowed him in half-a-dozen delicious bites.
Poor, poor Jonathan.
Luckily, though, all Jonathan's friends are named Jonathan too, so they'll never know he's missing.
|
You know, I’m sure this is just a coincidence, but....nah, it’s meta. Doesn’t matter. Still, this is just creepy. (Not wolf creepy, creepy creepy. And hilarious, of course.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nog
Nerwen - I feel uncomfortable with her right now. The more people say she was probably just joking with her "Go wolves!" the more plausible it seems as a cobbler-tactics (or even wolf-tactics)... if you see what I mean. Your tendency to believe it a joke makes it a worthwhile deception.
|
My thoughts exactly. There’s a fine line between jokes and actual hinting, and since we’re in a madhouse I think it’s safe to say that Nerwen would be a little more cavalier even than usual with her hints, knowing that most people would brush them off as simply being funny.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
I am getting very concerned about Jonathan now. He is just too sweet and crunchy (all of him). What does he have to hide?
Actually... *assumes serious expression* I'm not sure what we can expect from the current set-up. We've got three unusual factors: two wolves, no Seer, and a tiny village. Would the wolves be able to ignore each other?
That's if we're hunting wolves. We seem to be hunting cobblers toDay. Tally-ho!
|
Again with this Jonathan the apple business. Can I ask, Nerwen, does this mean something? (As in is it a reference to something? ‘Cause I don’t get it.) And then the ‘what does he have to hide?’ business at the end. What does Nerwen have to say, should be the question.
Yeah, we do. What with less than a dozen people to start with and two wolves in such closed quarters, it’s certainly a different dynamic than we’re used to. But can wolves really ignore each other in any situation? Leave little trace, sure, but in any game no matter what the size wolves will at some point interact. So really there’s not a whole lot to that statement. Sorry, love.
And again, this just feels off to me. “Oooo, let’s go cobbler hunting!” Sounds like something a wolf would say, and again it seems Nerwen’s hiding her role behind a joke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Now that those pesky villagers have been lulled into a false sense of security, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilwa
Yeah, I actually disagree. I think since there are only 2 of them and they do have to survive together a while they would actually be more adament about their trust, they don't want to risk one of them dying so they should be more likely to defend each other.
|
Ye-es.... only it'll be harder then usual for the wolves to control the lynch this early, and if one dies and leaves a clear trail to the other– game over. (Poor widdle fings)
So I could see them turning on each other, if it came to that... I mean, it depends on who they are, and what happens.
What we should do is ask everyone what they'd do if they were wolves, and the ones who do the exact opposite are the actual wolves.
Like so:
Nerwen: Jonathan, what would you do if you were a wolf?
Jonathan (squeaky voice): Oooo.... let me see... if I were a wolf, Nerwen, I'd be long, squishy, green and tasteless. Definitely.
Nerwen: Whereas you are in fact round, crisp, red and delicious? *voice drips with irony* Oh, how very convenient!
|
Again with the jokes. Time and a place, Nerwen, time and a place. (Of course this is still the first Day but all of her jokes seem too pointed. Am I just being paranoid?)
This (the bolded bit) also is a nice bit of give and take with Nerwen and Wilwa....possibly between packmates? Then more joking from Nerwen and teasing about the wolves being poor things, etc. Then back to the wolves turning on each other. It seems like hinting to me.
Okay, please forgive the madness, but I’ve got an interesting idea. What if Morsul’s a nutter and decided that the wolves are blind? Well, not blind, but mad, and unable to talk to each other. Like they have to PM through Morsul or something equally odd. This idea came out of nowhere, but it would rather make sense given the theme of the game, and I could see Morsul doing it since there’s not a lot else that’s different about the game. Dunno, just found it interesting.
And of course Nerwen’s obsessed with her little apple friend. Nutter.
So lemme ask you, Nerwen, what would
you do if you were a wolf?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nog
I went back to see what Nerwen actually said in the beginning and am a bit less enthusiastic in voting her. What Pitch summed up in his resumé was in a way correct but Nerwen's actual comments are not actually that much driving the discussion towards Boro but more like just reacting to things said just before.
But to see Pitch being the main source of my heightened suspicion of Nerwen makes me actually raise my eyebrow. A coincidence?
|
So now that we know Pitch was innocent what does that do to your opinions, dear?
And yes, you’re right about Nerwen not driving the discussion. However, she was involved in it to an extent and that’s what a good wolf does; they participate without being too noticed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitch
Now that's really helpful, thank you. And that right after making a really good point about wolf strategy in this game. (Yes, Nog and wilwa, I've noted your objections, but I'm not quite convinced yet.)
But d'you know what, Nerwen, this mixture of perfect sense and madness is getting on my nerves...
|
I concur. Nerwen’s simply too smooth. And the fact that Pitch was killed last Night....I think a wolf Nerwen would make the risky kill in hopes that we innocents would think it was a set-up. I wouldn’t put it past her. (Of course it could have nothing to do with his suspicions of her, meh.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durelin
Basically, Nogrod's first couple posts gave me a vibe of some vague sort. Loslote is annoyingly agree-able and like 'im going to be helpful!' But so is Sally.
Glirdan seemed like low-radar wolf somehow, and Kitanna seemed like 'I'm going to be the sense in this chaos and skate through silly Day 1 mwaha.'
But Pitchwife could be the same thing.
And Isabel is low-radar skater wolf.
|
So this may be irrelevant, but in this post she didn’t mention Nerwen. Coincidence? No idea. (In fact, she leaves out Boro, Nerwen, and Wilwa. I’ll go with this more when I analyze Durelin but I find it interesting that one of them was the cobbler and the other two are my two top-ish suspects.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottie
Nerwen is actually quite bothering me right now. She speaks sense, but then won't stop evil bantering - and we're all laughing right with her. I think she's pushing it, and she's one of my top suspects.
|
And again, I agree. Of course as mentioned before it was only Day One, but people are letting this joking slide when to me it looked more evil than most. I miss Little Lottie, btw. =(
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottie
No, I think it's suspicious that Nerwen's saying "Oh I'm soooo evil! Haha isn't it hilarious???" and Wilwa's playing along. I doubt if they're both wolves, but I'm pretty sure one is. I think it's Nerwen. Soo...
++Nerwen
|
And again, Lottie and I agree. (Oooo, and an interesting theory. I could be completely wrong about a Nerwen/Wilwa pairing, and Nerwen’s just trying to set Wilwa up. That’d be a trip.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzy
What purpose would it serve her, if she were nefarious to go around proclaiming it?
To see if it would be passed off as first Day banter and play?
If she is nefarious and is lynched because of her proclamations; then that would be quite the silly wolf. Or do you supposed she is the Cobbler?
|
Well yes, it would be silly, but you just proved that it works. Being silly will be seen as either being silly or as being silly to seem silly, which either way will likely be dismissed. You just proved my point. People will dismiss her because no wolf would possibly be that silly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Yeah, and I might have just been having fun. I mean, your "case" against me seems to be based entirely on one early joke-post. Opportunistic, no? And I also don't like the fact that you really went in on me after I mentioned that I was having problems with internet access.
|
Actually, I’ve been drawing the same conclusions from multiple joke posts. It’s not the jokes that’s a problem, it’s the tone and placement of them. And again, she seems to be trying to make Lottie look bad and thus keep people from listening to her. Seems pretty nasty to me. (Of course with the internet thing, fine, as I completely feel your pain.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen, in reaction to the false sense of security post
Nope. That's a semi-joking accusation. I didn't like the way Wilwa kept repeating that we had plenty of time and nothing to worry about, and I was seeing how she'd react.
|
Seems pretty flimsy defense to me. Sorry dear, I’m not buying it. Try putting it on eBay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen, after voting Lottie
Like I said, my gut feeling is that she's only the cobbler– but heck, she was a pretty lethal cobbler last time.
Let's hope for the best.
|
Yes, but last time she was a cursed cobbler. So....erm, nope, not seeing your logic. I think you knew she was innocent and were taking your best opportunity to get her out of the way before people started believing her. (Of course at this point Lottie was dead anyway so it hardly mattered but in appearance how Nerwen voted. Still, she got what she wanted, she did.)
Also, I point to Nog’s #152. He sums up quite a lot of things beautifully, but I’ll not quote it here as I’ve not a lot to add to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilwa
So at this present time I find myself in the situation that I often find myself in. Not having enough suspects. Nog looks good, Pitch looks good, Kit looks good. Izzy and Sally are in my "under the reindeer" category. Dury and Nerwen confuse me, I don't necessarily see them as being suspicious, but I certainly don't trust them either, it's more like I'm having a crazy hard time getting a read on them. Glirdan, well you all know how I feel about him.
|
And again, Wilwa here looks at Nerwen and then just dismisses her. “Can’t make up my mind. Oh well, moving on....”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durelin
Anyway...my gut is full of bad feelings for people. Except Sally all of a sudden for some reason. I'm kinda not caring about Glirdan or Wilwa (except for her last post, esp. her first lines which make no sense...I need to go back and look) right now. Isabel is bothersome in her barely existing, and Nerwen...I have no idea. Kitanna is creepy.
Nogrod and Pitch are bothering me. They've both taken opportunities to say how much they thought Loslote was innocent and reasonable. How nice and dandy of you two, but does it matter? Yes yes, you'll say I'm just bitter that I didn't get it right and voted for her...hah! If I was bitter every time I lynched a helpless innocent... Also, Nogrod for his thing on Nerwen's 'yay wolves' comment. Yay innocents = wolf, yay wolves = wolf...
|
And again, Durelin was very careful not to say anything on Nerwen. Other people are ‘creepy’ or ‘bothersome’ but Nerwen....meh, she doesn’t seem to care. Interesting....
The bolded bit is interesting indeed, and to me quite wolfish. But the bit that interests me is how she dislikes Nog’s ‘case’ on Nerwen. Erm, he didn’t just dislike that one comment....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
First off, I'd like to say that I'm not sure why this suspicion of Kit (from Nogrod, Sally and Dury), as she hasn't struck me playing evilly, and in fact seems to me one of the most reasonable and useful players.
|
....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
As for Sally herself– in that same post, all her suspicions are variants of "Just seems evil. Yeah." Which is, at best, very lazy playing.
|
Heh. So because she’s reasonable she’s innocent? Riiiight. I’m going to hazard a guess that Nerwen is (subconsciously, but still) just wanting to keep Kit around because she wants to keep her around. (As in Kit isn’t trying to lynch Nerwen so Nerwen’s not gonna lynch Kit, if that makes sense.) And notice that she then moves on to second some things that Kit’s said. Yeah.
Oh, and this is (as I mentioned before) a point of potential attack. She’s trying to discredit me just like she did with Lottie, and I won’t be standing for it. Nope, nope, not a bit. Neener.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen, re: me voting Kit
Which would all be fine– except that I was apparently Sally's top suspect earlier, for some reason, while she was on the fence about Kit– until Nogrod and Dury started going after her and looked like they might vote her.
|
Erm, if you’ll notice, in my post #172 I said I’d looked at her and my suspicions had increased. I voted for her because in my opinion supporting a possible wolf lynch is better than throwing away a vote on you when I didn’t think it was likely you’d be the lynch of the Day. So again, putting words in my mouth. (Although I can understand the mistake, as I wasn’t able to properly voice my opinions when I voted. Still, who’s being opportunistic now?)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
So, I'm running out of time here. Out of the people who already have votes, I'll go for
++Sally.
Not liking Glirdan either, but she's started looking even creepier lately.
|
Oh, so me making a case based on creeps is guilty, but you doing it is all right? I see. Thanks so much for clearing that up. I was very confused. Then again, you’re the one voting an innocent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
That's nice, Sally. Do you ever plan to make a genuine case against me, or indeed anyone? Or is it going to remain, "Just, you know, feels evil... *shrug*"
And why am I back at the top of your suspicion-list toDay? Why did you switch from me to Kit yesterDay, and now back again? Well?
|
Oh, and yours was air-tight. “She’s started looking even creepier lately.” Brilliant reasoning, m’dear. (Then again, Glirdan was also innocent, so voting him wouldn’t have been much better. That’s beside the point.) And you saw my post quite clearly, so again, I say you’re just trying to make me look bad. And of course I’ve explained my thing about you and Kit so I shan’t say it again. *nods sagely*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilwa
Nerwen: has slipped slightly under my radar, I know lots of people have found some odd stuff with her but I just see regular Nerwen everywhere, I don't really feel strongly about her either way. Kinda the same with Izzy, I read their posts and seem to tend to agree with a lot of what they say, and what I don't agree with doesn't really strike me as suspicious. Unless one of them does something whacko I probably will continue to leave them alone.
|
I dislike the level of meh in this bit. She can’t see Nerwen as evil and she admits it, which makes me consider the possibility that she’s just blinded, as I don’t think an evil Wilwa would have phrased it like that, but at the same time it makes me question things.
All in all Nerwen jests and expects it to be taken as that, even seems to be laughing at us as if to say ‘see, no matter what I do I can talk myself out of it’. She’s slippery and isn’t saying nearly enough of proper consequence; that and what she does say makes me nauseous. I smell fur.
Nerwen, you wanted me to analyze you? Now you got it. Thanks for helping me to solidify my suspicions against you.
EDIT that's not an edit: x'd since my last, as I just hit 'post reply' and haven't had the chance to read anything else yet. Oh, and may as well make it official....
++Nerwen