OK, before I do anything else:
Firstly, as
Pitch has already said, it's the other way around. Also, I don't think any of our two posts were meant totally seriously. Next you'll suggest that
Pitchwife was going to create a craziness scale and vote (wait, no,
lynch 
) people higher up.
#60,
#65,
#69,
#72,
#77,
#82, and
#85 are all debating with
Nog about suspecting vs. trusting. I don't know about anyone else, but I found that annoying to read through the first time (when I thought dl was fast approaching and was trying to get caught up) and extremely suspicious the next few times.
Steve explains his earlier posts; qualifies his earlier posts; and flip-flops a lot, all the while arguing with
Nog.
Firstly, the last of those posts was made when there were three hours until the planned DL. Three hours! If you miscalculated the time then you shouldn't attack me just because you were in a bad mood. Anyway, all I was saying in all of those posts is that in this game we're given a new weapon against the wolves. Why waste it and try to turn this into a normal game when
(a) We haven't yet explored this new style of voting; and
(b) We can't turn this into a normal game anyway because we're voting for the opposite thing?
That's not to say that no-one should post their suspicions (as I have said countless times before now). That's what a large proportion of posts are anyway. That's what needs to be done in order to do anything in this game. It's just that I don't think these fake votes are necessary.
And then everyone assumes that I'm trying to stifle people's opinions?
And since when did
Nogrod become He Who Only Speaks The Truth? It seems that everyone has just blindly followed him, because he suggested that we should mention who we find suspicious, which is what we do anyway.
However, I will say this- Yesterday there were quite a few people who didn't mention who they thought was suspicious and in this way maybe
Nogrod had the right idea. It was just that I thought a fake vote was going too far.
Have you? A lot of her posts are just agreeing with people. Look at
this. #51 is a good point, but #61 is just the obvious (which I'll admit I did neglect to mention in my post just before). Then she comes in with a post count which isn't really that useful. The she does make quite good point in the next post (#90), but I don't think I read that at the time (and she basically just continuing along #51's line of thought anyway). The rest of her posts were after my list.
Ok, I admit it, not only was I hypocritical there, but wrong. Happy now?
Well, if you look at my list,
Izzy was on the innocent side. On my vote post, I seem to have said "x-ed with
Fea" rather than "
since Fea". Seeing that
Pitch (who I thought more innocent) had got
Fea's vote, I wanted to save
Izzy too, as it didn't seem like anyone would be voting
Gwath (on my suspicious list, by the way). Anything wrong with that?
Now to actually start the Day...