Quote:
Originally Posted by wilwarin538
Well the second one because he is suggesting he is an ord (making the him/lottie pairing ord-ord).
But that's interesting, cause he agrees that there are no wolf-wolf pairings, but then says there is an ord-ord pairing. But to have both there would need to be a gifted-gifted pairing aswell (do the math, I'm right), which could only be possible if I'm the Ranger.
So....this is an interesting position you've put us in Nogrod.
|
Yeah, I read that wrong. I thought he was implying he knew there were
no ordo/ordo pairings, which was of course strange. Silly me, go back to remedial English. *headdesks* And believe me, there's no gifted/gifted pairing, as you so helpfully pointed out. There could be gifted/wolf or wolf/wolf though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
If you lynch me - you lose. That simple.
Unless:
a) the ranger gives you one more Day to try
b) you're a wolf after some odd laziness by your real seer and then as a wolf you win
On the second one: Lottie was an ordinary innocent and I am an ordinary innocent. I do trust what the mod writes in the roles department after the narrations and the PM's he sends me concerning my role - so I tend to say I know it.
Also I know you don't know it. But I only said I know it.
|
Well I don't know it because there still could be an ordo/ordo pairing, which wouldn't completely surprise me. I just find it interesting that there were specifically enough roles (i.e. wolf, gifted) for half of the village to have one. It seems too neat for me. Or am I overanalzying?
Anyway I need to take care of a few things then I'll finish Lari.