I had a whole long post written up explaining to Lari why her theory on Hakon dreaming Fea was pretty absurd, and now it's useless. *sigh*
So, quickly before I head out for the night (my time), it doesn't need stating but I'll say it anyways: The wolves could not have known that Greenie was the cobbler. Ergo, her lynching should be looked at as the lynching of an innocent.
Briefly:
Me- you'll have to draw your own conclusions.
Nogrod- put Greenie in the lead. He had been going back and forth about her for since Day 1, so his vote didn't exactly come out of nowhere. His timing in relation to my vote may be coincidence, or it may be that he saw an opportunity.
SPM- his reasons for voting Greenie basically echoed mine, though up till that point, I don't believe *note: I have not had time to read through carefully* he expressed suspicion towards Greenie before that. This is the second time he has helped lynch an innocent.
Fea- also her second time lynching an innocent. Voted Greenie to save herself. I suppose it's understandable, but I didn't at all like the way she went along with Lari's theory. It was extremely convenient for her, of course, but the flaws in it were obvious, as Nerwen pointed out. I also think her post about lynching her not helping the village sounded very wolfish. After the events of the last Day, she looks the most suspicious to me.
Also, not to alarm anyone, but the wolves now make up more than a third of the village. We are running out of time. Lynch an innocent toDay and ToMorrow, and we lose. We can't afford another mistake.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy
I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen
|