[Nerwen]

I was just re-reading... but I didn't get very far... too exasperated by Roa's latest (#411).

She summarises what everyone else said regarding Loslote yesterDay. Now, the first thing that strikes me is the degree to which she blows her own trumpet over not having suspected Loslote:

Originally Posted by Roa_Aoife

I said she was probably innocent.

(...)

I do an analysis of Loslote, as promised, and find nothing suspicious.

(...)

I say that I don't believe Loslote is intentionally misrepresenting Brinn.

I'm just saying, how often do people summarise their own comments? Not very. Is there a point to her doing this, other than to say, "See? My hands are clean!"

And then there's this:

Originally Posted by Roa_Aoife

Nerwen says the [I]possibilities for wolf are Loslote, Roa, or Inzil

No, I didn't. I said this:

Originally Posted by Me

Anyway– leaving aside the gifted claimants and the known innocent, we have (from my point of view):

Inziladun
Loslote
Roa
Legate
Lairen Shadow
Brinn

So it's either Wolflote stumbling through her cubhood, or it's Roa Awolfe getting over confident, or it's Inzilawolf being a little too slick for his own good, or it's somebody else very sneaky indeed.

In other words, I was merely stating the obvious– "It's either one of the players who are getting attention, or it isn't".

Originally Posted by Roa_Aoife

Nerwen double checks that Loslote is now lynched.

Now, I noted in my next-to-last post yesterDay that my connection had started playing up shortly before DL. At that point I had only just been able to get back on, and I wasn't sure what had happened.

The way Roa describes what I did is, to my mind, very much an example of the use of weasel-words. Can you read that line without getting the impression of Evil!Nerwen making sure her fiendish plot had succeeded, nyeh-heh-heh-heh-heh?

I haven't checked what she said other players said against what they actually did say, but just judging from what she said about me, she's doing some serious twisting there. No wonder she didn't see anything wrong with Lottie's analysis.

I still think this is zealotry rather than wolvery, but it's getting to me.

EDIT:X'd since Inzil.