Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitchwife
I sort of agree with Legate about the Morsul-Nienna controversy - Morsul's vote was practically screaming 'clueless newbie', so Nienna might as well have shrugged it off; on the other hand, she hasn't accused him in turn or made a big fuss over the matter, she merely expressed her annoyance and pointed out that his reasons are bad (which they are). Overreaction yes, but wolfishness?
|
Not necessarily, no... and perhaps not so much of an overreaction. I mean, it's all too easy for a silly vote on Day One to turn into a bandwagon.
However,
this is pinging my radar a bit–
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nienna
I'm hesitant to vote Hakon because he is usually lynched early just because of his playing style.
|
The following is somewhat meta-game reasoning, I guess, but anyway– that happens to be very close to a quote from a
Nerwolf on Day One last game. That is, I voted for somebody else while explaining why I wasn't going to lynch
Hakon just because of his history of being lynched early... with the subtext that hey, look everyone, this guy's actually pretty darned lynch-worthy *hint**hint*
Interestingly, I believe
Nienna was the only goodie in that game who picked up what I'd done... Could a
Wolfienna have remembered it as a useful technique? I'd certainly be flattered if that's the case.
*shrug* You could argue the other way, and say that a
Wolfienna wouldn't use the same method in the very next game, especially when I'm playing too.
X'd with a host, including
Pitchy's revelation. Well, well.