Quote:
Originally Posted by Legate of Amon Lanc
It's called meta-game reasoning. We seem to be having too much of that around here this time already, thank you.
|
Exactly. Although it should be added that it's difficult, or probably even impossible
, to ignore all the meta-reasons one has for suspecting people on Day1. But it's a different thing to have suspicions based on some meta-reasons than to try and argue for ones votes with them.
Like I just can't help it that because
Greenie has so totally fooled me a few times lately and I have the feeling she's always a baddie it makes me suspect her also on this Day. Or if I thought the mod had made a slip in the narration I couldn't help that thought affecting my suspicions, but I couldn't argue my "case" based on that slip as it would be kind of "unsporty" (some of you might remember
Glirdan's game where he slipped the gender of the last wolf in the narration that one being the only one of that sex left).
So let's try not to suspect people based on meta-reasons and at least not use them as arguments...
Okay. Off with the meta-reason discussion with me.
I need to make a pie for the girls but I will think while doing it. But just from the last posts a few little things...
Somehow the way how
Lari makes her comment on
wilwa strikes me:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lari
Wilwa: She has good points and is optimistic, we should keep her around.
|
It may be that she just wished to express herself differently (there are many of whom she says only "seems innocent" or "pretty innocent looking" etc.). But of
wilwa she says that we should keep her around with actual backing / arguments for why she thinks so. And I think there had been some suspicions raised on
wilwa, so that would fit "nicely"
...
Secondly I do share
Legate's concern on
Nienna. The way she reacted to one badly backed vote early in the voting really looks like she felt the whole village was after her. And that's something the wolves tend to feel more easily than innocents.
EDIT: X'd with wilwa