Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Roa
					
				 Also, once again, I call for a vote of no confidence in Nienna. Again, it's better to not allow anyone to have the full power of a captain. Even if you think they're innocent, the only way to know for sure is if you're a wolf. So without a known innocent to fill the position, we need to keep rotating for the safety of the village. It's too great a risk. | 
	
 
	Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Legate
					
				 Which basically means that you want to be captain, mind you. Or, "mind you" - surely I do not have to remind you of that, you must be aware of it. You are the third person, and have been so since Day 1, apart from me and Nienna now (and okay, Rune on the first Day), who seems to have good enough support to become a Captain. So in other words, by insisting on switching the Captains, you also ask for becoming a Captain - indirectly. | 
	
 Why is it that everytime I come up with some clever point I read the thread only to find that someone else has already stated it? Because this is exactly what I thought when I saw 
Roa's post. She would have known when posting that that many people would be voting her. 
I don't like 
Roa's last post. It doesn't feel innocent. An innocent, I'd think, would be more inclined to state their opinions on people etc, whereas 
Roa just puts up this martyr show even when no one has voted her yet and a few have voiced suspicion of her. I don't like it. It looks somehow calculatedly hysterical.
I'm currently quite torn about 
Lommy. Given 
Roa's recent behaviour and the fact that I suspect her, 
Lommy's careful vote of 
Roa for Captaincy seems quite bad. It's not open support, it's more like calculated hesitation before voting her as Captain in order to make it look less obvious. I don't like it. But then, 
Lommy did seem sort of genuine when I Night-talked with her. I don't know, maybe I should know better after being royally fooled by her in live WW a couple of times, but somehow I can't see a wolf deliberately settling on Night-talking in RL rather than via PM. After all, in writing you can phrase your answers more carefully and the one you're talking to can't read your expressions, tones of voice, etc. I don't know, though: at times her phrasing of things and her tone and such didn't seem natural, but it might of course just be due to talking about WW in RL which is a thing neither of us is used to.
	Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Lommy
					
				 I don't think that'd be too much of a problem - people suspect her well enough and she would only be the Captain for one Day and Night. And remember a vocal villager only has as much power as we give her. | 
	
 Actually here is another 
Lommy quote that can be categorised as subtle support of 
Roa: it says nothing at all like "I trust 
Roa, you should do so too!" which would be way too obvious, but instead hints vaguely at that it wouldn't be all that dangerous to vote 
Roa for Captain *wink wink*. So yes, if 
Roa is a baddie it makes 
Lommy look worse.