Random Thought 1.1
I don't think the wolves would seek to guard themselves. Why would vote to guard their fellows. Why would they seek to remove one of their own from the night time discussions? Wouldn't they desire to have full input from their fellows.
We know they found the way to beat the guard votes, but I can't see wolves seeking to NG one of their own, unless if there was no choice and it was a throw away to mislead us...But because of Inzil's guard votes, I'm inclined to think
Pitch is innocent, and
Nogrod probably too, but there is more doubt since that bandwagon made it pretty clear
Nogrod would be protected.
Still it wouldn't make sense for wolves to want to NG eachother, especially a
Nogwolf, he would not want to be silenced during the night.
One little thing about
Shasta that bothers me and I didn't get a chance to bring up, when he said this towards
Legate.
Quote:
1. You say "us innocents", which is generally a baddie tell,  ~Post 249
|
I don't like those types of suspicions, because it relies on certain words people use, and we all have common words or phrases we recycle. Just because we say I'd like to "see" more from this person or "watch" them doesn't mean we are saying "Hi. Im the seer!"
Legate's usage of "us innocents" or identifying with the innocents shouldn't point to any one's wolvery or not, it's a very common thing to say in this game.
Ok, I didn't believe
Legate, because I didn't find it conceivable that the wolves would not take advantage of their 2-kills...obviously I was wrong (and so did everyone else who decided to vote
Legate)...but suspecting Legate in the way
Shasta did, pointing out a common phrase many of us use looks bad. So,
Shasta, whatcha got to say for yourself?