Last Night there was a hunter in action. It was either
Rikae or me killing the other. Well, it was
Rikae who killed me. Had it been otherwise, I would be the hunter and I would have no reason to lie you about it.
I know I'm innocent - and a bit frustrated one because of the way I died - but you have no way to know it. Fine and dandy.
I do think you'll waste your lynch on me but if you wish, go ahead. I would probably take a more active role as a known innocent as that would feel like an obligation to help you as you cleared me - although I can't promise to deliver in this madness this game is (like
Lommy said earlier: no offence
Brinn - it's been fun and all that - but this concept sucks: there is nothing to grab for and so very little chances for reasoning anything).
But you guys lynched
Mira already when there would have been a chance to lynch a mutineer. Now let's be as rational as we can in these circumstances!
And who was behind these ideas (to lynch
Mira and to lynch a ghost instead of a possible mutineer - mutineer-ghosts are dead anyway)?
Boro...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greenie
I don't understand what's going on between Boro and Mac. Or, more accurately, Boro, Mac and Lommy. Boro and Mac are suspecting each other all the time but both seem reluctant to do anything concrete about it (potential wolf-on-wolf?). Lommy is convinced Mac is evil. Lommy and Boro are joking around together and testing each other, and as a result seem to consider each other innocent. Go figure.
|
Exactly my thoughts! I'm not liking the way this thing is heading towards...
But from my position of a ghost I can safely take the other point of view as well, one I had totally forgotten as I was not around when it happened... I heard about it but forgot it until these latest discussions.
So the mutineers missed a kill! Well that is interesting and would basically rule out all the US. veterans (DL is just too nice for them and they would take care personally a kill was sent in time). But it could imply some un-orderedness among the mutineers - or which would be even better: low numbers!
Hmm... Food for thought. If that interpretation is correct you should go for those less experienced and scarcely on-line people... if not, then you have a galley (sic!) of suspects:
Boro,
Mac,
Lommy,
Mith,
Kath...
But before we have shared thoughts about these two very different interpretations of the situation I could have proposed lynching
Boro, if there was not this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
This is the most frustrating thing for me. Because if I know one wolf, I'm confident in my ability to track down others, it's always getting that first one that is a big trouble, and...well as you don't need me saying, I don't know if we have it.
|
Most of what he's said has sounded like evil to my ears this far but this looks like pure innocent-thinking... Okay
Boro could think this and perform it even if a wolf, but it's so much easier to think as an innocent what a wolf might do than to actually do things as a wolf (I know, I've been a wolf enough many times).
Sadly I'm not ready to give him the green card as yet either as how he explained that quote looked a bit fishy.
EDIT: X'd with a host of posts...