Here til about half 11 (my time) now, will be posting on and off as I catch up.
So before anything else I think I'll answer Rikae as I didn't get a chance to before about the twisting words thing. This is where it came from.
Shasta posted this:
Quote:
|
Arr, what be the particklar pros 'n cons o' exorcisin A Little Drunk fer good 'n all? Belike 'n I don' wonder if'n discov'rin the wench's true ident-watchacallit cud on'y be good fer us!
|
From which I gathered: what do people thing the pros and cons of double-lynching Greenie would be, good just for us or good for the wolves too?
Rikae then said:
Quote:
|
Shasta, that be treacherous talk. Arr, I see no point in double lynchin' anybody until doin' so is likely to give us some really useful information. We double lynch Greenie, and we're either rid o' a cobbler (who can't do much harm now anyway) but don't know anythin', or we have proved Nerwen's innocence, but later in th' game, a double lynch o' th' right person will probably benefit us a lot more. I thought ye were bein' framed by th' aggressors, but now I be havin' second thoughts. Arrr.
|
Which I thought was a good list of cons, but that the 'treacherous talk' business was a bit odd.
Annu then jumped on to that, quoting the 'treacherous talk' bit with:
Quote:
|
Aye, me notions exactly! Try an' state yer reasons better fer double lynching Greenie, Shasta, or ye be makin' me more suspicious o' ye.
|
This I think is where I got the 'twisting words' from, because Shasta never actually said 'lets lynch Greenie again' yet that's what seemed to get later said. I think though that it was actually Annu who was twisting words rather than Rikae, but because Annu quoted Rikae I had assumed they were making the same point.