Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
Perhaps Nogrod, ye can share why ye think Inziladun's vote looks more suspicious than Lommy's?...I mean more than simply sayin' ye disagree. ![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](http://forum.barrowdowns.com/ubb/rolleyes.gif)
|
Okay. It looked more sincere... well the way she thinks and posts in general. Well, she just is like that. You remember the famous "
Lommy flip-flop"? She goes this way then that way... looking at it from all angles - and taking personal motives into account.
With
Inziladun I think it was easier, possibly more calculative... But anyway quite safe-looking thing: just refer to a few points others have made and then say it's weak but better than nothing. I don't like that kind of votes - hiding behind the backs of others and making it clear you're not wholeheartedly sticking to it.
So
Lommy looked more sincere,
Inziladun less.
That isn't to say
Lommy couldn't be the mutineer...