I don't see why ye be so quick t' believe our dearly depa'ted powder monkey's revelation. Tho' it be possible t' aggressors got so lucky on Night 2, th' odds be in favor o' her bein' a co-conspirator, an' her sayin' she'd a' revealed later proves nothin'. I don' quite trust those what accepted tha' explanation so easily. At least I be sure o' this: ef'n I war a co-conspirator what found meself dead on Day 2, I would be a-claimin' t' be th' spy right off th' bat too, 'xactly like Greenie ha' done. Oh well. Either way, I'll wager we'll see more seer reveals down th' line, an' we can sort this thing out then.
What worries me now, tho', are th' reactions t' th' drunk - p'ticklarly Eonwe n' Inziladun's, because o' t' way they latch onto th' idea o' a co-conspirator (ef I be readin' them right) revealin' later - plus, I didn't much like their contributions o' yesterday, either. Zil jus' gave me a bad feelin' (I'll hafta go back n' try t' pin down why), and Eonwe's reaction t' my hunter comment was mighty p'culiar. Yes, Nerwie, Eonwe was right: I were speakin' o' th' hunter, although I wasn't exactly right - if th' hunter makes a kill, we'll know more, but still ha' no exact knowledge. I'm not goin' into th' specifics, lest I be given ideas t' th' mutinous dogs.
Nogrod seems a bit confused, but more or less like hiis innocent self. Shasta, I think, is bein' set up, an' therefore no aggressor. Mac seems ok so far. Sally seems a bit off. I'm gonna hafta look n' see ef thar be anythin' in Nerwen's posts that might have a cobbler-Green thinkin' she be evil. McGhostie don't look intirely kosher. If I be leavin' yer name out, it be 'cuz ye haven' made much o' an impression. More later.
Be there any other alcoholic b'vridges on this here tub? Whiskey, ale, anythin'?
EDIT: X'd w' Boro, Gwath, Boro
|