Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nog
This is no game, we have to kill someone, for real! Think about it! Who are you ready to vote this time? It's not just the common WW-vote in the 'Downs but your vote is for someone for real...
|
Then there's no way I'm voting for you or
Green today, and I'd like to avoid voting
Brinn,
Fea,
Form,
Nilp,
sally and
Shasta as well. That leaves only people who are new or who I've had relatively little interaction with, which doesn't sound quite fair, either. Ergo, I should probably vote for the one(s) I suspect the most, whoever they are...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Form
It's hardly possible that we've got any sweet girls of quieter disposition and a propensity to books at this Downer gathering, right? Clearly, Form shall remain the celibate man he is, with little difficulty.
|
What about
Brinn or
Green?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kuru
Isn't there a tad bit of inconsistency here?
|
No because Frollo appeared good but was in fact evil and just used Quasimodo to his own ends.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kent
Ok. What do you think about bonus votes?
|
They'll weigh more in the end when there are fewer people around. People should think about how to use them wisely. Vote counts are almost useless because there's Pippin messing things up. The baddies might want to try to save their bonus votes for later as there's nothing very suspicious in that ("I don't suspect anyone enough to give xem several votes now, I'd rather wait till my bonus votes are actually needed..."), but it's dangerous if they get their votes to overnumber ours. Basically they could just control the game by lynching innocents during the days and killing them at night. Etc.