Quote:
Originally Posted by Dury to Fea
If you're really convinced I'm lying, it might make sense, but you know we can't afford to just flippantly 'test' if I am.
|
I don't think it would be a flippant test but something based on quite a believable scenario - as I explained earlier. Believable scenarios have been wrong in the past - but they have been right as well. And if I have to choose between random and argued lynch I'd sure choose the latter. The question is just whether we can argue for a better case as there are two ducks still remaining?
So if you
Dury are a goodie I'd suggest you rolled up your sleeves and took into it.
But if
Nilp and
Mith are going to vote on just whatever whim that pleases them, we might as well quit the game right now. Why bother trying to find out the last ducks if only two of us will try to catch the duck and two will vote against any duck-vote... and two will vote whatever they please? Meaning the outcome of the vote - and the game - will depend on any whim the "neutrals" happen to have...