Quote:
Originally Posted by Brinniel
Okay, due to this behaviour modification, we really need to watch how we vote. That means we shouldn't vote for someone because they're too chatty, don't post enough, act annoying, etc. You never know...it could be a modification assignment. Instead, we should suspect/lynch based on who and what reasons players suspect one another. Going in that direction is more likely going to catch us a were-duck rather than just examining posting style, lack of serious participation, etc. In fact, I think it may be smart to carefully look at those who do choose to vote for someone based only on behaviour.
|
Perfectly, completely agreed. Makes me think good of ye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
and what about Legate, Lommy... bad! Unless they come up with a huge post in the near future explaining their silence right now with the fact that they are doing great tasks taking all their attention for hours).  |
I am sorry, sir. Is that sufficient?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
I don't want to get a tough with this as Mith did the last time around but there is actually something that kind of is bad for the game there.
Not that people shouldn't socialise at all when a game is underway but when people interact privately while a game is on there is a feeling of... Well, hard to say.
|
But it does not concern the game at all. Besides, I never talk about WW outside the game (except when I am safely dead). (/end of out-game note)