Just brushed my teeth at 6.45 (glad it's Sunday)
tp and
Nerwen you should think again - maybe I just didn't make the point clearly enough.
Fea made that weird voting-post where she said she votes for
Hansy and then casually adds that
Quote:
|
Because I'm not in nearly a good enough mood to be nice to newbies for the sheer sake of it, and Nog has a way of saying interesting things on Day One.
|
After that - after I questioned her about that addition of me "saying interesting things on Day1" (which looks like a deliberate formulation) in her vote-post, she explained she had thought me to be the seer who got the Black Queen on the first Night (with all that stuff with
Lommy's first name in Finnish and
Hansy vs. Han Solo etc.). That looks like genuine to me. She probably thought that IRL as it's too complicated to fabricate just like that. But why did she voice it in the first place if she really thought I was the seer? And why did she explain it that openly after being asked about it? A goodie would have not acted that way if she had that kind of an idea... but to a cobbler (or with different scenarios possibly other baddies as well) it might have been a decent thing to do.
The initial comment bothers me and also the way some people rush to explain it.
Fea's explanation looks good as it's probably earnest but the reason she made the first remark looks more shadowy. And remember that she can be frank about her reasons for wrongly thinking me the seer even if she's a baddie but she can't explain why she had to make that unconnected remark in the first place.
Any ideas why she made it? Other than trying to hint to some other(s) with evil intentions about a possible treat for the Night?