Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr. Leggings
First: why her and not Mac: simple. I find it likely that the Wolves took Mac as being protected toNight, and instead of risking the loss of a kill, they decided to keep him for later and attack somebody else. Also, there's been some controversy (coming mainly from the dead one herself) around Mac being a Cobbler or whatnot, which may have played its role as well.
|
That sounds reasonable but for one thing - the ranger didn't protect
Lommy the night after her reveal, which means basically that s/he assumed the wolves would assume that s/he'd protect
Lommy and decide not to attack her. And if they assume they can't get the Seer then who would the wolves target if not
Mac the known innocent (unless he's Ferny)? It's quite logical (at least in some sense) that
Mac was already protected that Night which would leave him defenceless last Night. That, in turn, leads to the question of why he was not killed toNight since the wolves (if they reason the way I do) had reason to assume he was not being protected last Night.
According to this logic, it looks very possible that
Mac is Ferny. I don't know - he hasn't seemed like that to me. Then, of course, it's possible that the wolves do not reason the way I do or else that my reasoning is faulty in some way.
EDIT: x-ed with Miri and Leggy