[Rune Son of Bjarne]

Lommy: Starts of with sugesting that Nogrod was killed because of possible Ranger suspicions, which I think could be correct. I don’t understand however why my vote was fatalist, what does fatalism (determinism) have to do with it? She mentions being uneasy about Sally.
In 437 she mentions having lynching Fea as a backup plan, which is a very weird suggestion, but not nesisarily a wraith suggestion.

All in all I think Lommy looks very innocent and I will move on to look at Sally, a person I had forgotten all about until I looked through Lommy’s posts.

Sally: I am really torn about Sally. . . She hardly said anything yesterday due to babysitting and such and today she has not been active at all. It is very hard to judge people on day 1 alone and she has not contributed with anything of substance since. Sally is normally a person that you notice, so when you hear hardly anything from her, you get the feeling that she is up to no good.

Mac: Starts the day of with a long post about what happened in the ending of Day 2, although not objective it gives a fairly desent overview of things. Then he makes that ridicules case against me and Fea. It does not make sense that he discards me as seer, because he doubt the seer would be so obvious, but thinks it plausible that I would be so obvious as a wraith. He uses my own words against me, which is always a good tactic, but basicly it seems like an easy case that might catch on. . . Then he makes his post about the reasons to kill Nogrod, he concludes that neither Aganzir nor Fea would kill him. Then he have 2 posts of comments which actually comes of as rather innocent. I am slightly worried about Mac and in lack of other candidates could vote for him, but I see no smoking gun yet.

Aganzir: Starts today of with a rant about Lommy, which makes you wonder. I don’t get why Lommy must not compare her to how she have played in other games, that is often a good way to find wraiths. It could that Aganzir is just general annoyed and innocent, but it can also be frustrating to be a wraith and get accused on (according to your self) “false” reasons. Anyways it is not a really incriminating post, but one that draws attention and maybe put together with other posts can give a good impression of Aganzirs role.
I think Aganzir’s post 474 seem very innocent, I cannot really explain why. . .I guess she just seems genuine and her responses do not seem like they are fabricated.


I might look at a few others like Rikae. . .but I don't know if I have the energy.