But
Nog, so-called "random" votes can be analyzed, too. I don't for a minute assume they're necessarily as random as they say, and failing to give a reason can be innocent enough in some circumstances and incriminating in others, just as pretty much any reasoning given can.
I hope we're not about to see a
Agan vs.
Nog feud ending in the loss of two innocents.
Nog would be rather easy to make a case against. The "I wouldn't do that as a wolf, really, I swear, I mean it" is reaslly no defense at all, but I don't find it incriminating, either. He is a bit paranoid, though.
Certainly the
Shasta kill could be an attempt to frame
Nog, at least in part, but I'm not so sure the "quiet player dead=
Nogwolf" equation is so widely accepted. Maybe that's just because I missed the games where it became so, though.
Agan looks more innocent than not toDay. Her reactions seem pretty reasonable to me.
On another note, perhaps we should just lynch
Sally. Every time I read one of her posts, I get stuck in this loop of "She looks so evil! But she's just being
Sally! But she looks SOOO evil! But she always looks evil!" - very distracting, at least.