Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thinlómien
Sorry to double post, but I've been considering reading Dune and Mists of Avalon, and I was thinking - could anyone give me opinions on them? What are they like? Are they worth the read? Are they something a busy student could read, or do they require more time and devotion?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lalwendë
Mists of Avalon does have slow parts, but it's also tremendously atmospheric - and if you are interested in reading Arthurian stories, it's good to read one from a wholly different perspective even if you end up not liking it! Though I'm sure you will like it.
It's especially evocative if you know the locations used, the West Country and the Vale of Avalon.
|
Not wishing to sound like a chauvinist, but I found
Mists of Avalon dreadfully boring and devoid of humor. I prefer T.H. White's retelling of the Arthurian cycle in
The Once and Future King. Mary Stewart's Merlin series (
The Crystal Cave, The Hollow Hills, etc.) is interesting in parts, but is rather somber, and tends to meander later on in the series.
The Dune series is excellent, an intriguing tale straddling fantasy and science fiction with a depth both politically and religiously which transcends most everything in the genre (save for maybe Asimov's
Foundation trilogy). Read
Dune, Dune Messiah, Children of Dune and
God Emperor of Dune, but go nae further. It gets silly afterwards, particularly since the original author died and the story was taken up by his not-so-talented son and a ghost writer. The amount of time the story spans is reminiscent of Tolkien, chronologically speaking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lalwendë
[And it's very Pagan and feminist - I like that as someone who's tackled Women Who Run With The Wolves  |
My significant other (who is glaring at me rather wolfishly at the moment), is an advocate of Clarissa Estes; therefore, rather than imperilling my very soul, I won't comment any further.