Sorry
Mith. Won't do it again. I can't deny it was fun though.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac
I'm not buying that, I'm afraid. It would have been a sloppy analysis if it paid no attention to this fact, but the rest of your analysis was not sloppy at all, so I suspect intent.
|
I can repeat it after the game.
Besides if an analysis is otherwise good, does it mean there can't be any sloppy bits?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac
On Aganzir suspecting Fea before: It could be (and is likely, I'd say) that Fea is the cobbler and Aganzir a critic, so that does not prove the innocence of either. Not to mention the critic-on-critic possibility.
|
I wasn't trying to prove my innocence with it, I was commenting on your post saying I started to suspect
Fea only now to save my skin.
I agree with
Boro about lynching
Fea, especially if the other candidate is me. I'm gradually getting more afraid also of him though.
I'll try if I can come up with something regarding
Mac before deadline.
edit: xed with two Feas, Kath & Mac