Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
I agree, nonetheless (forgot to include this in my last post) that it's rather peculiar that Aganzir got in this time, when I believe she's only made one post.
|
I don't know what was so strange about that. Why shouldn't someone who only made a couple posts get voted as a rep? And I think on Day 1, several players were voted for based on their reputation rather than simply what they had posted.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
*applauds*
I'm thoroughly enjoying the Gil-Shasta double-act. Pure comedy gold.
|
Nerwen wasn't the only one who expressed amusement towards the whole
Gil/Shasta thing. I just can't understand why people found it so amusing. I don't believe there was much to think about when it came to their interactions.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Can we assume that Gil's out? His confusion looks pretty genuine to me (however, I haven't played with him much).
|
This is a comment that stood out as strange to me. It feels that she's a bit eager to know whether he's out of the game. If she's innocent and assumes
Gil is too, I would think she'd want him to stay in the game. Especially when it was only Day 1.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Well, that was predictable.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Boro and phantom... yes, I guessed what you were up to, though I was a bit slow on the uptake.
|
These comments strike me as odd. It feels like she's trying really hard to keep up with
Boro and
tp, and stay on their good side.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Firstly– R.I.P. Shasta! And nice work from our reps...
|
This is another reaction that seems fabricated to me.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
No, no, hang around. We can always lynch you if we get stuck.
|
The second sentence is the one I find weird. Saying that he shouldn't drop out only because he's useful in numbers, whether he votes or not. The problem I have here is why not encourage him to actually participate rather than tell him to stick around so we can lynch him "just in case"?