Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Okay, I know I'm getting heated but this is just too much! You cannot say that to me. You're the one nit-picking and making mountains out of molehills all the time. I have no doubt it's wise to question about everything everyone says but when you do that, you can hardly blame anyone for making small issues sound bigger than they are.
|
This was from the
Lommy/Aganzir battle. I said initially I thought this was ordo vs. ordo, and I still believe that.
Lommy's frustrations here remind me of an innocent
Lommy. She's had this argument before with
Aganzir as an ordo.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Don't make me a rep, or I'll be tempted... *evil grin*
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Btw, assuming that we two and Gil are innocent, we have a 66% chance of getting it right if we double-lynch two of the others. Tempting, isn't it? But then again, if we get it wrong...
|
Would a wolf openly express temptation towards a double lynch like this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Lastly, I've been thinking... we shouldn't lynch tp or Boro toDay. However annoying they are. I suggest keeping an eye on them for they are acting mighty suspiciously, but I'd really rather keep them around for a while more (a Day or two) since there is nothing extremely serious against them and they will provide more and more evidence againt or for themselves as the game goes on. You may call me an elitist or a turncloak, I know - but I'd hate to lose players like them in vain. If they're innocent, they're a huge asset to the village.
That is, they would be a huge asset if they weren't such a distraction. I therefore suggest (or to phrase better, echo the earlier suggestions) that we should stop focuing on them like this. And that "we" means all of us, even the gentlemen themselves. We're assisting the wolves by this single-mindedness, especially if Boro and tp are innocent.
|
I think it was
Lommy who initially brought up the idea that we should lynch
Boro or
tp. The fact that she brought it up seems pretty innocent to me. Those two were heavily suspected that Day, and I just can't see why a wolf would not take advantage of getting at least one lynched.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
++THE Ka
That's the closest I can get to a reasonable vote toDay. She's a submarine the likes of which we can't really afford, and like I've said, she tnds to have more serious stuff to say when she's innocent.
|
A wolf-on-wolf vote is possible here, but I don't think it's likely.
Ka was sliding under the radar and
Lommy's vote helped bring attention to her.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
I wish I had so much time that I could go through everybody's rep votes... I think that'd reveal something: I doubt the wolves voted people who were strongly after their fellows to be reps...
|
That's a good point. I should go back to my voting list and check that out.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Or what if we take it by chance? Like, decide that one of us is an even number and one of us is an odd number. Then, let's take some number we don't know (say, exact size of Portugal in square kilometers, or how many hits do you get by googling some word, or how many posts 'downer x has or so on) and check what's it. If it's an even number, the one who's even number has to vote first, if it's an odd number, the one who's odd number has to vote first. Makes sense?
|
Lommy, sometimes I wonder how your brain works. You make things so much more complicated than they really are.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
1) important: vote against a filibuster just to be on the safe side
|
Good point. I had actually forgotten about the whole filibuster thing until you mentioned it. And so I don't forget again:
++No Filibuster
Poor
Fea never got her filibuster. Now she will kill us all.
