Quote:
What case? Where?
It was a list.  ~Agan
|
This frightens me;
Agan in 276:
Quote:
Guilty
Lommy. I know I tend to suspect her, especially on the first days. And to me she almost always seems overreactive and suspicious. But it happening always is not an excuse for me to put her in the Neither cathegory so she's happily here again.
|
Then you proceed to point out all the strange comments/things about
Lommy.
Last time this struck a chord with me when
Mac (too bad I never had the spine to vote for him) brought suspicions up about
Brinn;
Brinn referred to it as a "case," and
Mac protested; trying to say
Brinn over-reacted to a couple of his thoughtful musings. It was odd because the bottom-line is it was a "case" against
Brinn.
Mac was definitely stretching, but the reaction of "Woah, Brinn! I didn't make a case against you," was what stuck out. It was a case. Period.
Mac said
Brinn looked suspicious and proceeded to quote her several times to make his case.
Agan, you made a case against
Lommy. Have the spine to admit it. You listed
Lommy as guilty and have gone after her, that's a case. Don't try to play it off like you really didn't mean anything by quoting
Lommy repeatedly, post after post, and play it off like
Lommy is being over-defensive.
And now you're backing off, after a couple people say
Lommy is looking genuinely frustrated (i.e. makes her look innocent)? Trying to seperate yourself from someone you wanted to get lynched?
Edit: crossed with everything since
Agan's post 373