Quote:
Originally Posted by Lommy
Intentionally or unintentionally, you're misinterpreting and misrepresenting me again. There's truth in what I said, but it was a sort of sarcastic comment, not a well-thought speculation about the game.
|
If it begins with a speculation about the game, be it well-thought or not, there's nothing to say the end is sarcastic, and I'm probably too tired to get your sarcasm right now. So if there was a misinterpretation, it was unintentional.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lommy
Really, why do you have to ask these things? Soon you'll probably ask "why does suspicious behaviour indicate someone's a werewolf (or possibly a gifted)?"
|
Quite the contrary. Actually just in your previous post if I remember correctly you were accusing me of trying to find suspicious behaviour instead of wolfish. So why does suspicious behaviour indicate someone's a werewolf? Tell me that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lommy
I did not say that! I'm more worried of wolves buddying up innocents.
|
I know you didn't, but I guess I automatically assumed that was one of your reasons since to me it seemed the only sensible reason to be suspicious of alliances.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lommy
Vote me, and get me lynched as an innocent on Day1 for the second time in a row and ensure I will get you lynched at least thrice on Day1 just to settle it...
|
And that's just the reason I don't want to do it right away! I suspect you always and am wrong more often than not because you're innocent more often than not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ka
I think Lobelia and Radagast have come to terms through counciling... Or good tea
|
Would you like a cup of Darjeeling, dear Radagast?