Quote:
Originally Posted by satansaloser2005
Re: Gil. Couldn't agree more. It doesn't help us any gamewise, unless he's trying to hide wolfishness behind not knowing the rules.
Re: Kath. Good to know. Perhaps, though, we could discuss that toMorrow, as we can't do anything about future reps before then? Not to say that you can't let your opinion be known, but I think it'd be better to talk about potential wolves than potential reps at this point. (And again, I'm tired, so if I misunderstand your post in some way please accept my apologies.)
In short, good thoughts. Now what do you think about wolves?
|
No you did not misunderstand, but you picking Representatives and deciding who to lynch is in some ways related. I have no real lynch candidates, but I do have people that I think would be good Representatives or that I just have a good feeling about. By saying this about Kath, I also say that I do not want her lynched and as such it is part of that debate. . .
The alternative would be that I would be very quiet until I got a proper susbect and that could take a while.
It would also mean that I could not defend anybody from accusations, as my focus would be on their presumed innocens.