Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
What also worries me about you Mac, is the quick change from saying I (and Fea) were the most suspicious/saying you could just lynch me tomorrow, to you thinking me innocent.
|
I was prepared to vote for you yesterday, but then you voted for yourself, and I came to the conclusion that you were looking innocent enough for me to reconsider and voting
Fea instead.
Now,
Mith's death... this could be the last day, so I would expect the wolf to stop making kills just meant to bluff and confuse and start making kills that are crucial to his/her survival.
Mith was very unlikely to vote for you. If you were a wolf in this situation, I would expected you to kill me or risk
Shasta.
This could just be another bluff (and your self-vote yet another), but there has to be a limit to the number of bluffs one person can pull. If you really did it I'm truly impressed, and hats off.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Are you?
|
No.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
I don't think Izzy would have cast the crucial vote for her wolf partner on Day 1 which was based on a random bandwagon anyway.
|
Shasta, that's exactly why I think
Izzy's vote for
CoD is more suspicious than
Mith's (or mine, too): at that time it
was only a random bandwaggon.
Izzy voted for him and even stated that it was a random throwaway (in hindsight, so that other people would be discouraged to follow her vote).
Keep in mind everybody: one vote for a non-wolf is a near defeat, because the wolf will immediately find a reason to bandwaggon on that vote and that person will have reached two votes first and die. There is a slim chance that the ranger survives today and is successful at night, but we really better get it right today.