Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nog
But let me add that toDay they look more like cobblers both of them trying to fill the thread with things that don't actually help us eg. speculating their mutual interpretations of what the other thought about this and that and all that other stuff.
|
Sorry, but I felt it necessary to explain my comments from yesterday. Surely that is not out of bounds?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
I also think it's folly to assume so quickly what Gwath's dreams must have certainly been. I mean, we can't be totally sure, can we? Same with phantom's assertion that he was dreamt.
|
First, I didn't say
Gwath dreamed about me. I said he dreamed about
Groin and
Mith.
Second, why not assume? I mean- we have to start someplace. If we aren't going to try and interpret the dreams of a Seer we might as well never have one. Of course in this village our problem is that both the assumed dreams are dead.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brin
But why would the seer quickly list off his dreams as innocent when he can't be sure if they're ordos or cobblers? By listing someone off as innocent it would give more of a message to trust that person rather than just not lynch them. While if he listed his dreams as cobblers, we'd know not to lynch them but at least not necessarily trust them.
|
Okay, I do understand where you are coming from, but do you honestly believe that
Gwath would do that? He knew he was the Seer, even if we didn't. He realized that his words might be looked at.