Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansun
I have a feeling Gandalf would employ much the same war and anti-terrorism policies that Bush used. Gandalf certainly was gung-ho in challenging an enemy with battle.
|
I'm afraid of getting in too deep here... this is dangerously close to politics...
But it seems only fair to point out that Gondor and Rohan were in rather different situations than the U.S. of the past decade. Whether you think Bush right or wrong with his war efforts, one cannot deny that the U.S., the "world's remaining superpower" charging off preemptively into the Middle East is rather different than Gandalf attempting to stem the tide of despair in the invaded nations of Gondor and Rohan and rouse them to a defence.
I'd say there's a lot more of Churchill in Gandalf as far that goes than Bush (though, mindful of my reputation elsewhere, let me affirm that I do not see any allegory betwixt them), insofar as an outnumbered Britain was alone and under attack.
In any case, lest there be any doubt that Gandalf is not a war-mongerer, take a look at his attempts to
stop battle occurring in
The Hobbit. Though he failed, due to the arrival of the goblins and wargs, chiefly, take note of his attempt nonetheless.
Oh, and I would definitely not vote for Gandal.
As he made quite clear himself with the Ring, power would make him all too dark and terrible.