Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Shasta makes you a bit uncomfortable with a post, but then a few sentences later Shasta's probably innocent? I wonder Agan, if you changed sides over night (whatever night it was)?
|
I wrote my day 3 stuff before I commented on that point of
Shasta's, which I hadn't noticed when I first read through day 4, and because I wanted to keep my post coherent I added it to where the rest of my day 4 related things were. Though it would have made more sense if I had written the day 3 things before the day 4 ones.
I think
Shasta looked innocent yesterday, but today I found that post of his strange.
And no, I didn't change sides.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae
However, I also don't see why Aganzir says Shasta was trying to look innocent by being the first to say something that Eomer had already said.
|
Whoops, it was so obvious that
Eomer had already said it that I forgot it.
Anyway, my main point was the following:
Shasta doesn't try to downplay the fact that
Eomer wasn't attacked, but brings it up himself, seemingly wondering about it. Would a wolf do it? It might be easier for him to try to hush it up, and therefore
Shasta might be a wolf. Garr I cannot explain it better. It looks silly but I hope you understand.
I never bothered to take a proper look at
Shasta, and although I'm feeling lazy right now, I think I could at least read through his posts. Though with
Nerwen and
Nilp dead I don't have any clear ideas anymore.