Quote:
Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim
A Wolf would not ask to be lynched (in normal circumstances) but a Wolf would quite easily want to be unhelpful. That's why it was not obvious that EW was innocent.
''Agree with many others here. Elf-Warrior has to go. He is clearly up to no good, whether he be hacker or spammer (and I am inclined to think he is more likely spammer).'' From post 203.
I did say as much.
You assumed that EW wasn't unhelpful, just short on time. You look at it one way, I another.
And I'm implying that you are a Wolf, eager to make himself look good by making a lot of other people look bad. We got it wrong, but at the time a number of us thought EW was guilty. I also noted that you found me suspicious yesterday and have found another reason to criticise me.
|
I took the liberty of adding the underline to your post, above. I don't understand how it was so "clear" to you that
EW was bad, because I still think five content-less posts is hardly enough to use to be clear on someone's guilt or innocence.
And I never said that it was obvious that he was an innocent. I said that if it was clear to you that he was, quote, asking to be lynched, unquote (again, asking to be lynched in five posts?), then it should have been equally clear to you that no Wolf in their right mind would act in such a manner that was likely to lead to their lynching.
Also, I am not "making" anyone look bad. You're managing that quite easily on your own.
Edit: X'd with the second
Eomer.