Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
That's one thing they do. But the thing I've found them doing more often is waiting for any decent or half-decent suspicions to raise up and then go for it - stronger or milder eg. trying to turn it into a major suspicion or just going with the flow and getting an excuse for their vote.
|
Or then they just bluntly jump on the bandwagon. Or then they defend people who are suspected in order to look better, for "a wolf would surely have just contributed to the lynching of an innocent." Or whatever. Depends on the wolf.
If people you are suspecting also feel evil or whatever in addition to that, I'm fine, but how-would-a-wolf-suspect-someone things are dangerous reasons to solely base suspicion on. A wolf can just choose the explanation that suits her current case best. Though that's the case with everything in WW... I think every word someone says can be used as an argument either for or against them.
I think
Nogrod has a good point about people backing off from suspecting
Nerwen.
Eönwë's vote came kind of out of the blue. I think he had never even mentioned
Mith before that.
xed with two Nogrods, Eönwë, Kath & Nerwen. So much for going to bed early today.