Quote:
Originally Posted by Lush
- just the idea of "do unto others... etc." It is a noble way of thinking, to be sure, but it is also not entirely selfless.
|
This is not strictly true. Frodo's sacrifice of his own enjoyment of the Shire for the sake of his fellow hobbits was entirely selfless. In the end, he had the opportunity to visit Aman as a result, but only retrospect could have shown him that chain of events. Though virtue sometimes does lead to a good end, that end is rarely foreseeable, which is why virtue is always best practiced for its own sake: for the sake of one's soul, as well as for the sake of others.
Perhaps looking after the condition of one's soul could be considered true self-interest, in which case virtue really isn't selfless at all...
Though, the condition of one's soul is hardly what most people would term one's highest interest these days, so maybe we only agree because we define our terms differently.
