|
Izzie Analysis
Day 1
Post 1 - Suggests Multitasking and hunting for both the EW and the wolves. Doesn't believe the GW or the EW would reveal to their teams.
Quiet post just chiming in on the current debates. Not terribly suspicious for a first post.
Post 2 - Thinks it may be possible to protect a wolf turned ordo and get information. Doesn't see a reason why usual wolf hunting methods won't work. Says the wizards are likely going to be people with out a lot of time contraints, etc., but we can't rule out anyone 100%.
Post 3 - Finds phantom cowardly, sheepish, and fatalistic. Suggests he should be actively hunting for wolves instead of insisting we're all doomed.
*snicker* Okay, besides that oh so satisfying content, I notice that she doesn't actively hunt herself, either.
Post 4 - Votes Roa
Where did that come from? Especially since I'd been saying everything she'd said, only louder and first.
Post 5 - question about deadline
Post 6 - was confused about time, surprised at size of village.
Not a lot of content from her, especially in way of suspicions.Her vote for me kind of came out of left field.
Day 2
Post 1 - Finds the page of silliness is suspicious, doesn't think speculating on who Volo dreamed of the previous Night will be useful since we can't know for sure, points out that we will be going into a large number of wolves soon. Doesn't see the need for all the vote tallies being posted, since they don't change.
Again, her first post is pretty straightforward. She doesn't say anything that isn't true.
Post 2 - finds phantom suspicious. Doesn't buy his reasoning for not voting and explains why
I think I found my shadow... I didn't realize that anyone else thought the same way I did, which concerns me a little. She slips so well under-the radar...
Post 3 - Still doesn't think phantom had a good reason for withholding his vote.
Post 4 - Response to phantom: "Does beautifully = truthfully without hidden agendas?"
Post 5 - Explains that previous vote was almost random. Thinks both phantom and Roa are suspicious. Says Brin can't use what Volo did to weigh her opinions too heavily because he likely didn't know much yet.
She never did explain her suspicion of me. For phantom it seems quite clear, and she says all the same things I did.
Post 6 - Says she's always "submarine like," says she'll post more if/when she has time. Leaning towards voting phantom or Roa.
Still doesn't explain why she thinks I'm suspicious.
Post 7 - Vote Roa.
No, seriously, where is that coming from. All of her suspicion is pointed towards phantom, except for one or two posts that say she doesn't trust me but doesn't give a reason, where as she gives lots of reasons for not trusting phantom, and yet she votes me with out explanation.
Post 8 - says her vote may be throw away, but she wants to vote for someone she's looked at, not someone she hasn't.
When exactly did she look at me?
Day 3
Post 1 - doesn't believe there are any ex-wolves because the numbers don't support it.
Post 2 - Curious about Cailin's behavior at deadline
Mentions suspicious behavior with out saying that it's suspicious.
Post 3 - Says "she" could have easily posted what she did to keep us analyzing it and wasting time.
I assume the she is Agan?
Post 4 - Asks Gwath why he analyzed Cailin
Post 5 - Considers voting for Diamond for too much joking around; Thinks Lommy and Agan may have been baddies together; Wants to look more closely at Lal; POints out that Greenie has been less active than her; wouldn't mind voting for Cailin either
At least here she gives some reasoning. Though she suspected the seer, everyone does that at one point or another.
Post 6 - Says she could vote phantom, VOTES DI
She's been saying phantom was suspicious since Day 1, and yet never votes for him. Does anyone else find that odd? Because I really do.
Post 7 - Comment on all the reveals, thinks Di said that phantom was a wolf
Post 8 - Agrees with Brin about Cailin
Day 4
Post 1 - Thinks that the EW scried either the GW or a gifted. Thinks phantom slipped and let everyone know that Di was not the true GW, and offers to point it out. Thinks that phantom must have been scried and is no longer a gifted.
This post is fairly erroneous. She doesn't account for the Ranger, and simply assumes that the other of our two gifted was scried, when we can't know that at all.
Conclusion: She says somethings that are sensical and does some things that aren't. Actions speak louder than words,even on a discussion board. She's definitely and odd one, and I would like to hear why she voted me twice with out any explanation.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy
I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen
|