I'm not at all impressed by EoCailin's defense.
Yes, I brought up the idea of Eomer voting having something to do with... anything... but I don't like how readily EoCailin has jumped on this as the answer to everything. Frankly, I brought it mainly to see how Cailin responded.
She could even be lying. But even if it is "the truth" then, duh, if Cailin is evil Eomer most certainly is. So we've go double the evil posting under one name. Two evil brains! It's horrifying. Lynching Cailin is practically a double lynch as you exorcise the evil ghost of Eomer, too.
Anyway, the main reason I'm not convinced by the idea that Eomer posting helps explain away any inconsistency is this (which happened in the same day) --
It doesn't answer, in my mind, why Cailin threatened to get me lynched, but then abruptly dropped her case when I told her flat out that being guilty of starting a lynch campaign against an innocent should prove very bad for her if she was successful, especially in light of Nerwen's death.
Instead of continuing to suspect me, she just went "Diamond's dying to be picked
" (sorry not a direct quote, I'm freestyling here) and pretty much dropped her "case."
Why?
Because she (HE?) knew I was right. She knew that going with the flow was better than starting a campaign against an innocent.
I don't like smug threats to get someone lynched. That's soooooooo wolvish. Innocents don't feel the sort of power that a wolf does, ergo don't go around saying "Don't complain to me when I get you lynched haha."