Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Rikae, at #184 you're saying that it's pointless to examine the Aganzir votes .
In your next post (#186) you start examining Gwath's vote for Aganzir– saying you're starting to "reconsider your suspicions".
Explain, please.
|
I didn't say being an Aganzir voter made one innocent. I didn't even say it was pointless to examine us. What I disagree with is the fact that
onlyAganzir voters are being examined, and everyone seems to have made up their minds (against all reason I can see), that there
must be a wolf among them.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Indeed– and also the likelihood of wolves lynching innocents. Are you seriously surprised that people are looking into it? Really?
|
I am definitely suprised that people seem to be dead certain there is a wolf among the three of us. If you honestly think that an innocent being lynched on day one means wolves must have voted for her, you haven't played much Werewolf. It would have been the easiest thing in the world for the wolves to avoid that spotlight- - it only took three votes. To put that in perspective, three people didn't vote at all (and you were one of them, no?) I wouldn't be surprised if there was a wolf or two among the
non-voters (
Nerwen,
Menel &
McCaber) and one or two among the safe-voters. That is, after all, where wolves generally prefer to be.
Remember, wolves don't really care who gets lynched, as long as it isn't one of their own (and even then, they're liable to turn on the one who's going down.) They don't need to jump into the middle of close races... they can sit back and watch the innocents lynch each other, which is statistically more probable than lynching a wolf.