I just got back reading things and noticed - the same one I see
Legate pointed out as well - but let me take one fresh look at it with a slight bolding...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac
Aganzir was innocent. Dammit.
I guess Lommy has been killed because I was her main suspect. She yet did not do any harm to a wolf, so better get rid of her before she eventually starts to. It sadly means that we can deduce little to nothing from her death.
|
I do agree with
Legate (if I understood him right) that your cursing about
Agan's innocence looks anything but sincere. The whole sentence about
Lommy not yet doing harm to a wolf is more than fishy: now why an ordo would think it that way - if
Lommy had not spotted a wolf yet why should they be in a special hurry to get her killed instead of me,
Legate,
Rikae,
Mac himself just to name a few good candidates? This whole approach looks pretty suspicious.
But take the bolding then. So we can't deduce anything about her death and still the two who suspected you the most:
Aganzir and
Lommy are now dead... How convenient. Or are they framing you? That's possible but somehow your way of trying to downplay everything we can read from
Lommy's death (and "dammitting"
Agan's) just looks lycantrophic.
I'll be back with more things...
EDIT: X'd with Mac and LG